Why Firefox is NOT ‘Safer, Faster, Better’

Why am I writing this article? Until about 5 o’clock yesterday when I stumbled upon Firefox Myths I was a true Firefox fan (not a fanboy), I told everyone Firefox is the Safest browser out there, it Faster than Internet Explorer, and it’s Better all around. I went and installed Firefox on all my computers at home (5 computers) and countless friends whose computers I’ve serviced. I was WRONG! I was wrong about Firefox’s God like status. It is not what it has been made out to be. I ask you to venture into Spread Firefox’s website, read through their forums/articles/comments and see for yourself how deceiving this Spread Firefox campaign has been. Below I will cover each of the abilities that Firefox claims to have - I will cover this from a high level approach, Andrew does a better job of explaining this. I’m writing this in hopes to reach users that blindly followed Firefox’s claims, I know I did, but promise to never do it again. Below I highlighted why Firefox is NOT ‘Safer, Faster, Better‘ My main source for this was Firefox Myths, other sources are listed below.

NOT Safer : All of us take browser vulnerabilities seriously; it’s one of the reasons among others, why we all flocked to Firefox (please notice I said one of the reasons, there are others). According to Firefox Myths, these are Firefoxes latest security statistics:

"…

Secunia - lists (122) security vulnerabilities in Firefox, (77) rated Highly Critical. - Source

Notes - The number of Secunia "advisories" (34) does not equal the actual amount of "vulnerabilities" (122). Over 10 advisories have multiple vulnerabilities, look carefully. SA19631 - Lists 24 Vulnerabilities Alone!

Mozilla - lists (125) security vulnerabilities in Firefox, (26) rated High and (54) Critical. - Source

CVE - lists (180) security vulnerabilities in Firefox. - Source


…"

These numbers may not reflect the exact number of current vulnerabilities due to Mozilla’s release of version 1.5.0.5 which resolved about 12 firefox vulnerabilities, but they do show Firefox is not as ‘Safe‘ as it is claimed to be.

NOT Faster : Below you will see a comparison that clearly shows Firefox is slower than Internet Explorer, Opera, and even Mozilla with regards to loading times.

“…

Myth - "Firefox is the Fastest Web Browser" - Example

Reality - Opera (now 100% Ad free) is the fastest Graphical Web Browser in Windows. - Source

Faster than Internet Explorer 6

Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Internet Explorer 6" - Example

Reality - Internet Explorer 6.x is clearly faster than Firefox 1.x in 6 out of 7 measures of performance and is significantly faster from a cold start. - Source

Notes - The argument that components of Internet Explorer may load during Windows Startup is nullified by Opera’s start times. Which means there is no excuse for this except poor coding on Firefox’s part.

Faster than Internet Explorer 7

Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Internet Explorer 7" - Example

Reality - Internet Explorer 7 is clearly faster than Firefox 1.x in 5 out of 7 measures of performance. - Source

Faster than Mozilla

Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Mozilla" - Example

Reality - Ironically Mozilla 1.8 is faster than Firefox 1.x in 5 out of 7 measures of performance.. - Source

Notes - Considering Firefox is supposed to be the lighter, leaner version of the Mozilla suite, this is very surprising.

…”


 

NOT Better: With regards to a better browser, well that is entirely up to the user, you may like, for example, the fact that StumbleUpon makes an extension for Firefox and Internet Explorer only, not Opera, you may stick with Firefox due to IE’s myriad of vulnerabilities, whatever the case may be, if we’re going to judge a piece of software and rate it Better based on capabilities alone, Opera would be the better browser (based on capabilities and speed), NOT firefox.

With all that said, I will keep a copy of Firefox on my computer (just for StumbleUpon, I’m addicted) until it is real eased for other browsers. I will continue to play with Opera, which by the way I’m loving and continue working on; I will also continue using IE7 and hope for the best when it is officially released.

Download Opera, Internet Explorer 7

Opera 9 - Your Web, Your choice

Secunia Security Bulletins

Mozilla Security Updates

Firefox Myths

SpreadFirefox Forums

Rob Ashton

Popular Technology.net

Dave’s Rants

 


Article posted on 07 30th, 2006

Related & Suggested Posts

  1. Mozilla Firefox & Essentials - Web Browser/Utilities
  2. How to View A Website’s Source Code
  3. The Difference Between a Browser and a Search Engine
  4. Internet Explorer 7 Beta 3 Is Now Available
  5. How to Automatically Clear Your Browsing History


3 Responses to “Why Firefox is NOT ‘Safer, Faster, Better’”

  1. media safe says:

    You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy…keep up the good work ;)

  2. Jay Knecht says:

    Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark.

  3. @Jay Knecth - You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback.

Leave a Comment

Note: I discourage users from using keywords in their names when posting comments, most of those are caught as spam and end up being deleted. It would be more productive and interactive if commentators use the name they go by rather than using an unrelated name. In the future I reserve the right to delete comments from users using a name other than their own.

Connect with Gil via
Connect with Gil
Facebook | Twitter | Digg | SU | LinkedIn
Who's behind Gil's Method?
My Name is Gilberto J Perera and I'm the editor behind Gil's Method. I started this blog to help relatives with computer questions. Since then the blog has grown to the collection of articles you see today, I hope that you find this blog useful and that you come back again.
Read more at my about page
Other Resources

Books (Coming Soon)

Forum (Coming Soon)

Store (Coming Soon)