http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter Technology How-to Guides for the Rest of Us Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-8401 Gilberto J Perera Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:11:39 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-8401 @Jay Knecth - You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback. @Jay Knecth – You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40289 Gilberto J Perera Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:11:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40289 @Jay Knecth - You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback. @Jay Knecth – You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40290 Gilberto J Perera Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:11:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40290 @Jay Knecth - You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback. @Jay Knecth – You are correct, the article is out of date. The date is found at the bottom of all articles, the reason for this is that a good portion of the visitors are sent from search engines and studies have found that visitors are very particular about the date of an article. In the case of this article it should be on top, but on the computer how-to guide (which is what I mostly write about) the dates should not matter only the software versions (which I point out at the beginning of the articles). I hope this makes sense and thank you for your feedback.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-8070 Jay Knecht Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:43:37 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-8070 Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark. Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40287 Jay Knecht Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:43:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40287 Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark. Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40288 Jay Knecht Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:43:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40288 Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark. Everyone reading this blog should take note of the details in the article. There should really be a date at the top of this article because it is vastly out of date. All of the comparisons above are for Firefox 1.x. Do a bit of research on the current version of Firefox (current stable release at time of this comment is v3.5.3), which has vastly improved on all of these measures, and IS faster and safer than IE on pretty much every benchmark.

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40285 media safe Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:48:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40285 You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy...keep up the good work ;) You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy…keep up the good work

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-40286 media safe Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:48:00 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-40286 You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy...keep up the good work ;) You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy…keep up the good work

]]> http://www.gilsmethod.com/whyfirefoxnotsaferfasterbetter/comment-page-1#comment-1130 media safe Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:48:05 +0000 http://www.gilsmethod.com/?p=213#comment-1130 You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy...keep up the good work ;) You have a great blog here and it is Nice to read some well written posts that have some relevancy…keep up the good work

]]>